Whoops...
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:03 pmfollow up story...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061115/ap_ ... rare_stamp
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:03 pmPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 11:27 amPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 3:52 pmWhew! 
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:03 pmI have to admit I am a bit confused by the two stories. (not unusual on any given news story)
story 1: Elections officials say stamp is on envelope in a box of invalidated absentee ballots that is BY LAW sealed for 22 months.
story 2: elections officials open box take out envelope and show stamp to reporters then put it back into box.
WTH?
If both these stories are true, it's no wonder some people had the heebee-jeebies about the florida elections a couple of presidential elections ago...
"The box containing the envelope was sealed before the stamp could be authenticated, and election laws do not allow the box to be reopened for 22 months." bbc
"However, the envelope is now in a box that by law cannot be opened. So it could be nearly two years before anyone is able to examine the stamp."
-- usatoday
"‘‘By that time we had already sealed the box. And once you seal the box, under the election law you can’t unseal it,’’ Broward County Court Judge Eric Beller said." -- tribune chronicle
Here's a video of a story that repeats the claim that the box cannot be opened for 22 months, with additional info about a person who claims to have mailed the ballot http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs. ... 24&start=1
but he claims the stamp was NOT an inverted Jenny at all.
And this story from the miami herald that claims the very stamp from the ballot is on display in a miami warehouse?
"For the first time since its discovery, the well-publicized Inverted Jenny stamp found on the envelope for an absentee ballot was on display on Monday in a Fort Lauderdale warehouse."
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/16005671.htm
Seriously, I SO don't trust the news. If they can't get the details right on a simple little story like this what are the odds they are getting the details right on the complicated stories?
story 1: Elections officials say stamp is on envelope in a box of invalidated absentee ballots that is BY LAW sealed for 22 months.
story 2: elections officials open box take out envelope and show stamp to reporters then put it back into box.
WTH?
If both these stories are true, it's no wonder some people had the heebee-jeebies about the florida elections a couple of presidential elections ago...
"The box containing the envelope was sealed before the stamp could be authenticated, and election laws do not allow the box to be reopened for 22 months." bbc
"However, the envelope is now in a box that by law cannot be opened. So it could be nearly two years before anyone is able to examine the stamp."
-- usatoday
"‘‘By that time we had already sealed the box. And once you seal the box, under the election law you can’t unseal it,’’ Broward County Court Judge Eric Beller said." -- tribune chronicle
Here's a video of a story that repeats the claim that the box cannot be opened for 22 months, with additional info about a person who claims to have mailed the ballot http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs. ... 24&start=1
but he claims the stamp was NOT an inverted Jenny at all.
And this story from the miami herald that claims the very stamp from the ballot is on display in a miami warehouse?
"For the first time since its discovery, the well-publicized Inverted Jenny stamp found on the envelope for an absentee ballot was on display on Monday in a Fort Lauderdale warehouse."
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/16005671.htm
Seriously, I SO don't trust the news. If they can't get the details right on a simple little story like this what are the odds they are getting the details right on the complicated stories?
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:11 pmlol - it's funny: I was just talking about this with Mrs. Baak and we were coming to the same conclusion: how could it be sealed for 22 months and have been viewed?
Interesting...
Interesting...
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:28 pmSeriously, I SO don't trust the news. If they can't get the details right on a simple little story like this what are the odds they are getting the details right on the complicated stories?
LOL, Should be (D)AP news, DIS-Associated press.
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:52 pmTwo Saks Wrote:Seriously, I SO don't trust the news. If they can't get the details right on a simple little story like this what are the odds they are getting the details right on the complicated stories?
LOL, Should be (D)AP news, DIS-Associated press.
OK I did a bit more thinking about the different stories and here is what I am able to deduce about the stamp.
A) The stamp the election worker saw on an absentee ballot is either a…
1. …genuine rare ‘flying jenny’ stamp.
2. …forgery of the rare ‘flying jenny’ stamp
3. …completely different stamp, not related to the ‘flying jenny’ at all
B) The stamp the election worker saw on an absentee ballot was either …
1. …mailed by accident.
2. …mailed on purpose.
C) The person who mailed the absentee ballot with the notorious stamp is
1) …unlikely to ever be identified
2) …an old stamp collector who has already been on the news talking about the story
D) The stamp the election worker saw on an absentee ballot is …
1. …still in the legally sealed box where it’s been since the ballot was received
2. …back in the legally sealed box it was originally placed in (when it was received) after being taken out briefly to show reporters.
3. …currently on display in a Miami warehouse.
So to find out the REAL story, just take one from item A, one from item B...